Search Site

Please check out our Japan radioactive seawater and floating debris modelling pages.

Radioactive Seawater

Floating Debris

ASR ltd. Twitter
RSS Feed Signup
ASR Internships
« Kerala Tourism - Promoting sustainable growth and development | Main | ASR Ltd. and Social Media »
Tuesday
Aug312010

Edison's San Onofre Artificial Reef

After two decades of planning and construction, Edison’s Reef is showing successful results and attracting lots of attention this month. Two years after its construction, the artificial reef has developed a vibrant kelp forest and according to a recent study is meeting a significant portion of the intended goals or results.

Originally constructed as a means to mitigate the fish killed when sucked into the massive cooling system intake for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, the California Coastal Commission ordered Edison to build the reef in 1991. A small test reef was built in ‘99 and after showing encouraging results, Edison moved forward with a grander scheme. Consider that in August of 2010, the reef is only now showing results – that can only be described as painstakingly slow.

For $46 million Edison Southern California, San Onofre Nuclear facility management partners, dumped 120,000 tons of rock in a pattern designed to generate a 176-acre kelp forest. The most exciting indication of the reef’s success is a thick canopy of kelp easily visible from the surface and the estimations as to fish biomass.

We’re honestly excited that kelp restoration type artificial reefs are seeing lots of interest – it’s an important move towards environmental restoration and perhaps sustainable coastal protection. We also happen to believe kelp restoration would make an excellent addition to a Multi-Purpose Reef like submerged structure, just as an idea.

This is the type of forward thinking needed to continue pushing agendas that make sense for the environment and humanity. Artificial reefs, dune restoration, kelp restoration, environmentally responsible coastal protection – if only we saw this type of response to the Gulf disasters rather than miles of useless sand berms.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>